Age of Accountability
Reflecting on moral responsibility in children, biblical teachings like Isaiah 7:15 hint at an “age of accountability,” although it doesn’t specify an exact age. In the US legal system, this is defined as between seven and fifteen years old.
Early Understanding
I understood that stealing was wrong from a young age, likely around six or seven, thanks to my mom’s guidance. While stealing tomatoes from the Benoit’s garden blurred lines, stealing steaks from Yesteryear Restaurant was clearly unethical.
Understanding Motivations
As an adult reflecting on my actions, I realized the risk of stealing seemed justified by the reward. Making Dad proud, who often went without, was a powerful motivator. His joy over simple treats like chocolate-covered cherries and peanut brittle resonated deeply.
Mixed Lessons
While I can’t excuse my actions or my father’s influence, which encouraged dishonesty, I empathize with the twelve-year-old boy craving paternal approval. Despite this, my mom remained steadfast in teaching right from wrong, countering my father’s influence.
Unresolved Issues
The incident with the stolen steaks was never openly discussed at home. My father never apologized, yet my mom and Mr. Schimel continued to treat me with love and respect.
Family Dynamics
I remain puzzled by how my adult siblings continued to honor and respect our father, despite his flawed teachings. Was it a result of indoctrination to “honor thy father,” pity, or a continuation of a complex family dynamic?
Personal Growth and Reflection
Reflecting on these experiences from “The Kite That Couldn’t Fly,” I realize that moral lessons, family dynamics, and personal growth are intertwined. Despite challenges and conflicting influences, understanding motivations and lessons learned shapes a deeper understanding of personal ethics and familial relationships.
Lessons Learned
- Complexity of Moral Development: The journey of understanding right and wrong is complex and influenced by familial teachings and personal experiences.
- Impact of Parental Influence: Parents play a crucial role in shaping ethical values, but conflicting messages can create moral dilemmas for children.
- Emotional Motivations: Emotions such as the desire for parental approval can override ethical considerations, leading to regrettable actions.
- Resilience and Reflection: Despite adverse influences, individuals can grow morally through reflection and understanding of their past actions.
Conclusion
In conclusion, “The Kite That Couldn’t Fly” offers profound reflections on moral development, familial influences, and personal growth. It highlights the complexities of childhood experiences and their lasting impacts on adult perspectives. By examining these themes, readers can gain insights into their own ethical journey and appreciate the significance of familial guidance in shaping moral values.
